Abrupt Climate change
in the Future


According to the Committee on Abrupt Climate Change of the US National Research Council:

There are essentially two definitions of abrupt climate change:

  • In terms of physics, it is a transition of the climate system into a different mode on a time scale that is faster than the responsible forcing.
  • In terms of impacts, "an abrupt change is one that takes place so rapidly and unexpectedly that human or natural systems have difficulty adapting to it".

These definitions are complementary: the former gives some insight into how abrupt climate change comes about ; the latter explains why there is so much research devoted to it, why it inspires catastrophe movies, and may even be the reason why you are reading this page.

Climate Changes

(View large)

It looks like a heartbeat. A jagged line, all rhythmic and vibrant and pulsing with energy — what you'd hope to see if you were hooked up to a heart monitor. Only it isn't a heartbeat, at least not in any literal sense. It is in fact the earth's climate, expressed in a graph, a record of our planet's cold snaps and warm flushes over the last 450,000 years or so — based largely on evidence gathered from core samples of polar ice. The time-span covered by the graph is a little brief to tell us much about ice ages as the planet has been going through one of those for around 40 million years!

What it does reveal are movements in and out of a series of cooler spells (known as glacials) and warmer periods (or interglacials) that have occurred within the broader sweep of the current ice age. Scientists have learned a great deal about our planet's climate in the last few decades.

It is now widely accepted that human activities are transforming global climate in its entirety. That has come as a shock for many of us, prompting a profound awakening as to just what a potent physical force our species has become. It also means that what people do in one part of the world can influence weather and life on the far side of the earth, driving home just how deeply, inescapably, interdependent we have all become at a global scale.

But human-induced climate change is not the only eye-opener. Through their attempts to pin down the extent to which human beings are altering climate, scientists have also discovered some quite breathtaking things about the way that climate changes of its own accord. What they have found may well turn out to transform the way we think about geological time and our very sense of the continuity of our world.

Glacial used to be a word for slow. For inching, crawling, imperceptibly slow change. Not any more. Many climate scientists now believe that shifts in and out of glacials takes place not over millennia, or even centuries, but in the matter of just a few short years.

That's what the sharp peaks and troughs on the graph are all about: dramatic shifts in climate occurring in less than the term of a government, less time than it takes to get a university degree or to finish the payments on a new car. It's all about part of the climate system reaching a tipping point.

One way this can happen is that changes in ice sheets cause a lot of fresh water to be dumped in the ocean, such as when a large river dammed up behind ice suddenly breaks free, or when glaciers do a lot of melting. This, in turn, can change the circulation of the ocean currents that convey warm salty water from the tropics to the northern oceans, sometimes switching this "conveyor" off entirely.

When this occurs, the northern latitudes suddenly get a lot colder — cold enough, perhaps, to trigger a new glacial epoch. Now look back at the graph. Though it is still rather spiky, the section to the far left — the last 10,000 years or so — stays within a fairly narrow limit, up there at the warmer end of the scale.

By comparison with most of the rest of the graph, this is a remarkably stable and balmy time. So stable that some commentators describe it as "a fluke in earth history". This pleasant little interval, a kind of geological happy hour, encompasses the whole time that humankind has settled into village and town life, domesticated plants and animals, and got ourselves "civilised" — as we like to put it.

How most of us humans live today, and just how many of can live anywhere like this, depends in a big way on this stable spell persisting. Theorists of abrupt climate change caution against complacency. Human-induced changes, they warn us, could tip us out of this stable phase, with a small warming quite possibly triggering a runaway return to extensive glaciation.

What is more, scientists argue, even without our own contribution, we should expect this fortuitous stability to come to an end, sooner or later.

Some recent evidence, however, is reassuring, suggesting we might even have another 16,000 years of relatively stable weather, if we don't mess it up. In a more general sense, what the record from the polar ice cores seems to be saying is that abrupt climate change is a normal part of our planet's history.

The implication is our species has had to endure sudden, dramatic climate change many times in the past, and that these changes have helped shape who and what we are, just as they have shaped most of the rest of life on earth.

A lot of things get shaken up when we start to think about the possibility of very sudden climatic change. We know it's important to try and work out which people and which countries are contributing most to climate change right now. Just as it's important to try and calculate what kind of impacts a slight warming might have on the different ways we now live.

But one of the lessons of looking at abrupt climate change is that sometimes quite small acts can have effects way out of proportion to the scale of the acts themselves. This means that we might have to start thinking rather differently about causes and effects, and about the way we apportion blame and responsibility. It also means we might have to think about impacts in a whole new way.

As one geologist put it "try writing an environmental impact statement for a continental glacier". In other words, we are tangled up in some vast and dynamic systems upon which we are very much dependent. Or rather, interdependent, as we too are an important part of these systems.

What the sudden climate change story reveals is just how much the interdependence which sustains us also makes us vulnerable, how it leaves us open to sudden change and the shock that may go with it. Now, we might take all this to be so complicated and so frightening that we just block it all out, and carry on as we are.

And in this way, greatly increase the risk of triggering events we are not at all prepared for. Or, we might see it as awe-inspiring and life-changing, something that puts everything else into perspective. In the words of writer Salman Rushdie, as he ponders some of the more momentous events that take place in our world: "these are the moments when the bolts of the universe fly open".

What if we were to let the bolts fly open for a while, let the story of abrupt climate change put a new twist on all the other stories we live by? We might start getting our heads around the idea that we live on a very lively and very volatile planet.

Scary, yes. Sobering, yes, indeed. But also intriguing. Perhaps even a little thrilling.

And that in itself could be a trigger for thinking about our interdependence with others and with our physical world in new and different ways. It might even turn out to be a 'tipping point' for some of our own rather momentous changes in what we do and how we do it.

Source: Nigel Clark, Lecturer in Geography at the Open University.

Dramatic ocean circulation changes revealed

The findings, published today (14 January 2011) in the journal Science, show that as the last Ice Age came to an end (10,000-20,000 years ago) the formation of deep water in the North-East Atlantic repeatedly switched on and off. This caused the climate to warm and cool for centuries at a time.

The circulation of the world's ocean helps to regulate the global climate. One way it does this is through the transport of heat carried by vast ocean currents, which together form the 'Great ocean conveyor'. Key to this conveyor is the sinking of water in the North-East Atlantic, a process that causes warm tropical waters to flow northwards in order to replace the sinking water. Europe is kept warmer by this circulation, so that a strong reduction in the rate at which deep water forms can cause widespread cooling of up to 10 degrees Celsius.

Scientists found that each time deep water formation switched off, the Northeast Atlantic did not fill with water that sank locally. Instead it became inundated with water that had originally formed near Antarctica and then spread rapidly northwards. The new results suggest that the Atlantic ocean is capable of radical changes in how it circulates on timescales as short as a few decades.

Past Events

Several periods of abrupt climate change have been identified in the paleoclimatic record. Notable examples include:

  • About 25 climate shifts, called Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles, which have been identified in the ice core record during the glacial period over the past 100,000 years. The most recent of these events was the Younger Dryas which began 12,900 years ago and moved back into a warm-and-wet climate regime about 11,600 years ago.
  • The Younger Dryas event, notably its sudden end. It has been suggested that: "The extreme rapidity of these changes in a variable that directly represents regional climate implies that the events at the end of the last glaciation may have been responses to some kind of threshold or trigger in the North Atlantic climate system."A model for this event based on disruption to the thermohaline circulation has been supported by other studies. In fact three studies suggest that the Younger Dryas event abruptly ended within 3-50 years. Whilst this wasn't a global event (no similar drop in temperature is seen in Antarctica) it did effect at least the whole of the northern hemisphere.
  • The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, timed at 50-55 million years ago, which may have been caused by the clathrate gun effect, although potential alternative mechanisms have been identified. This was associated with rapid ocean acidification.
  • The Permian-Triassic Extinction Event, also known as the great dying, in which up to 95% of all species became extinct, has been hypothesized to be related to a rapid change in global climate. Life on land took 30M years to recover.

There are also abrupt climate changes associated with the catastrophic draining of glacial lakes. One example of this is the 8.2 kiloyear event, which associated with the draining of Glacial Lake Agassiz. Another example is the Antarctic Cold Reversal, c. 14,500 years before present (BP), which is believed to have been caused by a melt water pulse from the Antarctic ice sheet. These rapid melt water release events have been hypothesized as a cause for Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles.


There is a growing school of thought that believes that major climate swings have been brought about by NEO strikes.

Reports and Supporting information